Make memories is the kind of phrase that ends up on a cushion or a holiday caption, easy to file away as sentimental. But underneath the slogan sits a genuinely serious idea from psychology, one that reframes why experiences matter and how a life is best spent. It comes down to a distinction most of us never quite make: the difference between living a moment and keeping it. Once you see it, the case for deliberately creating memories stops looking like a caption cliche and starts looking like one of the more important things a person can pay attention to.
You have two selves, and only one of them lasts
The psychologist Daniel Kahneman drew a distinction that sounds abstract and turns out to be profound. We each contain an experiencing self, which lives moment to moment, and a remembering self, which afterward stitches those moments into a story. The two do not agree, and, Kahneman argued, the remembering self wins: it is the remembering self that decides whether a holiday was good, whether a life is going well, because memories are essentially all we get to keep.
The experiencing self has no vote in any of this. Its moments happen and then vanish. Which means, a little strangely, that we do not really live for happiness so much as for the memory of it. And that reframes the whole question of how to spend time. An experience you will never recall barely registers in the ledger of your life, while one that becomes a durable memory pays out, quietly, for years afterward.
The Artful Age
A weekly letter on aging well, family across generations, and the creative life after the kids leave home.
The strange way memory keeps score
The remembering self is not a faithful recorder, though, and knowing how it distorts is half the value here. Kahneman found that we judge an experience not by its overall quality or its length but by two moments: its most intense point, the peak, and the way it ended. The stretches in between are largely lost, a quirk he called duration neglect. A two-week trip is remembered through a handful of high points and its final day, not through its several hundred hours.
This is a flaw, but it is also useful information. It means the way to create memories that genuinely last is not to fill time evenly but to build in real peaks, moments of intensity, novelty or emotion, and to end things well, because a sour final note can retroactively stain an otherwise lovely stretch. The memory is not the sum of the experience. It is the highlight and the exit.
Why experiences beat possessions
This is also why a well-known finding about money holds up. The psychologist Thomas Gilovich and colleagues have shown across many studies that, once basic needs are met, people draw more lasting happiness from spending on experiences than on possessions, and a large part of the reason is memory: people mentally revisit their experiences far more often than their purchases.
The new sofa becomes background within a few weeks, while the weekend away gets replayed for years and folded into who you are. Possessions sit outside you and wear out. Experiences turn into memories, and memories become part of your identity. This is the concrete version of make memories. If you have some discretionary time or money, the evidence says to buy experiences over objects, because what you are really buying is the version of them you will carry around afterward.
The honest caveats
Several caveats keep all this from hardening into a tyranny. The first is that memory’s unreliability cuts both ways. Because we remember peaks and endings, the pressure to engineer perfect moments can pull us clean out of the ordinary present, and the ordinary present is where most of a life actually happens. A parent so busy staging a magical day that they spend it tense and distracted has sacrificed the experiencing self for a memory that may not even form well.
The second is documentation. Research suggests that compulsively photographing an experience can, in some situations, reduce how much we engage with it and later remember it, as the camera quietly becomes a substitute for attention rather than an aid to it. And the third is proportion. Kahneman’s insight can curdle into the notion that only memorable moments count, which is both false and a little sad. The quiet, unremarkable, unremembered hours, the ordinary Tuesday, are not wasted simply because the remembering self declines to file them. The experiencing self was there, and it mattered while it lasted.
The balance worth striking
So the useful version of the importance of creating memories is a balance rather than a command. Yes, take the trip rather than buy the thing. Build real peaks into your time instead of letting it pass in an undifferentiated blur. End things on a good note where you can. Gather the experiences your future self will get to keep, because in a real sense they are what your life will amount to when you eventually look back on it.
But do all of that without turning the present into raw material for a highlight reel, and without dismissing the ordinary time the highlights are made of. The deepest reading of the idea is almost gentle. Your remembering self is writing the story of your life whether you help it or not, so it is worth, every now and then, deliberately handing it something good to write down, and then, camera lowered, actually being there for it.